B) To comply with PRH's requirement.

B）为了遵循企鹅兰登书屋的要求。

32. Why did Waterstones shops retire PRH books to their relevant sections?

32. 为什么 Waterstones 将企鹅兰登书屋书籍退回到相关区域？

C) To respond to PRH's business move.

C）为了回应企鹅兰登书屋的业务举措。

A) Sales of books by mid-list PRH writers fall off considerably.

A）企鹅兰登书屋腰部作家的书籍销量大幅下降。

We are not boycotting PRH titles but we are doing our utmost to ensure that availability for customers remains good despite the lower overall levels of stock.

我们没有抵制企鹅兰登书屋的图书，尽管库存总量较少，但我们正在尽最大努力为顾客保障供应。

In the meantime, PRH authors have been the losers — as have customers, who might expect the new titles from the country's biggest publisher to be prominently displayed by its biggest book retailer.

与此同时，企鹅兰登书屋的作者们一直是输家——顾客也是，他们可能会期待该国最大出版商的新书会在最大的图书零售商的醒目位置摆放。

Big-name PRH authors may suffer a bit, but it's those mid-list authors, who normally rely on Waterstones staff's passion for promoting books by lesser-known writers, who will be praying for an end to the dispute.

企鹅兰登书屋的知名作者可能会受到一些影响，但那些通常依靠 Waterstones 员工的热情来推广书的腰部作者，才会祈求这场纷争的结束。

The trade magazine The Bookseller reported that Waterstones branch managers were being told to remove PRH books from prominent areas such as tables, display spaces and windows, and were " quietly retiring them to their relevant sections."

行业杂志《书商》报道称，Waterstones 分店经理被告知要把公共书籍从桌子、展示空间和橱窗等显眼的地方移走，并 “悄悄地把它们退到相关区域”。